.png)
The notion of ESG (environment, Social, and Governance) has become a crucial framework for assessing organisations' ethical standards and long-term survival in the context of corporate responsibility and sustainability. But recent issues involving Tesla's mysterious CEO, Elon Musk, have highlighted the difficulties and complexities involved in evaluating businesses using an ESG perspective. We explore the complex discussion behind Musk's criticism of ESG ratings in this blog, as well as the wider ramifications for investors and companies.
Understanding ESG
ESG represents a holistic approach to evaluating a company's performance across three key dimensions: environmental impact, social responsibility, and Corporate Governance. These factors are increasingly viewed as essential indicators of a company's sustainability and ethical practices, influencing investment decisions and stakeholder perceptions.
Elon Musk's Critique:
Musk's outspoken criticism of ESG ratings has sparked considerable debate within the corporate world. He has referred to ESG as the "Devil" and labelled it a "scam," citing instances where tobacco companies receive higher ESG ratings than Tesla, despite the latter's focus on sustainable electric vehicle production. Musk's dissatisfaction stems from what he perceives as flawed methodologies and inconsistencies in ESG assessments, raising questions about the effectiveness and reliability of these frameworks.
Reasons why Elon Musk thinks ESG is “SCAM”
Alongside 34 other companies, Tesla lost its place in the index during its annual reshuffle, despite its notable focus on environmentally conscious transportation.
In a blog post released on May 17, Margaret Dorn, the head of ESG indices for North America at S&P Dow Jones Indices, elaborated on the reasons behind Tesla's exclusion. Despite Tesla's ESG score being largely stable year over year, its competitors in the international industry outperformed it. Allegations of racial discrimination at one of Tesla's factories were one of many factors that influenced the decision. The California Department of Fair Employment and Housing filed a lawsuit against Tesla in response to these allegations. In response, Tesla issued a statement in February 2022 vehemently opposing all forms of discrimination and harassment. Tesla deemed the lawsuit unfair and counterproductive, particularly as it pertained to events from years ago.
Musk, serving as CEO of Tesla, expressed his discontent with the index reshuffle via Twitter, alleging that "@SPGlobalRatings has lost their integrity." The billionaire voiced his frustration over the fact that Exxon Mobil, an oil giant entangled in controversies regarding climate denialism, retained a top 10 position on the ESG list while Tesla, his electric car company, was completely removed.
Now, let's delve into why Tesla was ousted from the S&P 500 ESG Index and what implications this holds for the company:
The S&P 500 ESG Index, established in 2019, assesses the stock value of major U.S.-listed companies based on specific sustainability criteria. It mirrors the original S&P 500 index, but
emphasises companies committed to robust ESG objectives, aiding investors in selecting firms aligned with such goals.
Companies included in the index undergo filtration processes to eliminate those engaged in industries contradictory to ESG principles, such as tobacco and contentious weapons manufacturing. Additionally, their adherence to the United Nations Global Compact, a worldwide framework for corporate social responsibility, is evaluated. Ultimately, entities with the lowest scores relative to their peers are excluded from the index.
The goal of the ESG Index is to give a more realistic picture of companies' commitment to corporate social responsibility than what they state on their website. According to Dorn, Reuters, "you have to look at their practices across all those key dimensions; you can't just take a company's mission statement at face value.
During the annual rebalance on May 2, over 300 companies from the original S&P 500 Index were featured on the ESG ranking, including industry giants like Apple, Nvidia, JP Morgan Chase, and Exxon Mobil. Notably, social media giant Meta, pharmaceutical company Johnson & Johnson, and car maker Chevron were among those removed from the list, alongside Tesla. Conversely, Musk's potential acquisition target, Twitter, and oil refiner Phillips 66 were added to the index.
According to Dorn's May 17 blog post, a number of factors contributed to Tesla's removal from the S&P 500 ESG Index. Tesla's decline in the index relative to its global industry peers was a primary reason for its exclusion. Factors contributing to this downturn included Tesla's perceived lack of a low-carbon strategy and codes of business conduct, along with allegations concerning racial discrimination and substandard working conditions at one of its factories. Additionally, concerns were raised regarding the company's handling of incidents involving deaths and injuries linked to its driver-assistance systems.
Despite requests for comment, Tesla did not provide a response in time for publication. However, a company spokesperson previously stated Tesla's commitment to minimising injuries and striving to establish the safest factory in the auto industry globally. According to the New York Times, Tesla and Musk have also claimed that the autopilot system in their vehicles increases safety.
While Tesla is helping to reduce the number of fuel-powered vehicles on the road, it has lagged behind its competitors when seen through a broader ESG lens," Dorn added.
How did Elon Musk react?
Tesla's CEO rushed to Twitter to express his displeasure with the news that the business had been removed from the S&P 500 ESG index. "ESG is a hoax. "It has been weaponized by phoney social justice warriors," Musk said.
In a series of subsequent posts, the tech titan shared memes mocking the inclusion of six oil firms on the index and claimed that a good "ESG score" indicates a company's cooperation with "the leftist agenda."
The notion of ESG has been criticised in some areas, primarily because it allows firms and investors to dodge scrutiny for socially harmful activities or investments. According to Bloomberg, the world's largest ESG-focused exchange-traded fund has about 3.1% of its assets in the oil and gas sector, which is driving the climate problem.
In its 2021 Impact Report, Tesla stated that "current ESG evaluation methodologies" are "fundamentally flawed" because they fail to consider the company's "real-world impact" on society and the environment.
Hiro Mizuno, a Tesla board member, tweeted that "current ratings often overestimate the reduction of negative impacts while neglecting positive impacts."
Challenges Faced by Tesla:
While Tesla is celebrated for its groundbreaking innovations in the electric vehicle industry, it faces significant challenges within the ESG framework. Allegations of racial discrimination, poor labour practices, and governance concerns have tarnished Tesla's ESG profile, leading to downgrades by rating agencies such as MSCI. These issues underscore the complexities of balancing environmental sustainability with social responsibility and effective governance.
Musk has previously voiced criticism of ESG, and Tesla has received lower scores than fossil fuel giants like Shell and Exxon, despite efforts to lead the electric vehicle market. This discrepancy highlights concerns about the reliability and potential biases of ESG ratings. Some claim that the emphasis on ESG has resulted in "greenwashing" and skewed assessments because tobacco companies scored higher than Tesla. Critics question the efficacy of ESG investing, noting that companies contributing to significant harm, such as tobacco, are rewarded with higher scores. Proponents of ESG, however, argue that while Tesla excels in environmental aspects, it falls short in social and governance factors, resulting in its lower overall score.
ESG vs. Sustainability vs. Impact:
One of the central points of contention in Musk's critique is the distinction between ESG, sustainability, and impact. While Musk advocates for recognising companies' real-world impact on society and the environment, ESG primarily focuses on evaluating the risks and opportunities posed by social, environmental, and governance factors to a company's enterprise value. This disconnect highlights the need for clarity and alignment between ESG frameworks and broader sustainability goals.
Implications for Tesla and Investors:
Tesla's removal from ESG indices and downgrades in ratings may have tangible implications for the company's stock value and investor confidence. Tesla's exclusion might cause investors who are subject to ESG index benchmarks to reassess their investment plans and portfolio allocations. However, despite controversies, some investors remain steadfast in their support for Tesla, emphasising the company's contributions to addressing climate change and advocating for a nuanced understanding of ESG considerations.
Navigating the Complexity of ESG:
The clash between Elon Musk and the ESG movement underscores the multifaceted nature of corporate responsibility and sustainability. While ESG provides a valuable framework for assessing companies' ethical practices, it is not without its limitations and challenges. Moving forward, stakeholders must navigate these complexities with nuance and clarity, recognising the dynamic interplay between environmental impact, social responsibility, and governance practices.
Conclusion
Elon Musk's critique of ESG ratings catalyzes broader discussions surrounding corporate responsibility and sustainability. While Tesla's innovations in the electric vehicle industry are commendable, addressing broader ESG concerns remains a crucial aspect of the company's long-term success and investor confidence. As the dialogue continues, stakeholders must engage in informed and constructive conversations, fostering a deeper understanding of the complexities inherent in evaluating companies through the lens of ESG.
Our Directors’ Institute- World Council of Directors can help you accelerate your board journey by training you on your roles and responsibilities to be carried out in an efficient manner helping you to make a significant contribution to the board and raise corporate governance standards within the organization.