top of page
Men in Suits

BlackRock Drops ESG, Shifts to "Transition Investing" - A Boon or Bust?

ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) investing has achieved remarkable traction in the last few years as investors are increasingly prioritizing sustainability and social responsibility as well as financial returns. However, the approach is now facing heavy criticism for its broad scope and lack of measurable impact. 

BlackRock’s Shift From ESG to “Transition Investing”

BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, has made headlines with its announcement of shifting from ESG investing to “transition investing” which is even more focused on environmental factors. Transition investing represents a shift from only exaggerating companies with ESG best practices to engaging with companies who are diligently shifting their business models towards sustainability. 

BlackRock’s decision to drop ESG and shift to transition investing.

BlackRock’s Reason Behind the Shift and Tariq Fancy's Perspective

BlackRock’s announcement to adopt a transition investing approach originated from the recognition that merely rewarding companies with good ESG scores is not expected to drive meaningful growth. BlackRock wants to help companies that are transitioning to a low-carbon economy. This move shows that they understand the financial sector needs to step up its game in promoting sustainability and holding companies accountable. Instead of just applauding companies already doing well in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics, BlackRock is now focusing on engaging with companies that are transforming their operations to be more sustainable.

Think of it this way: It’s like the difference between congratulating a star student who always gets straight A's and supporting a student who is working hard to improve their grades. BlackRock wants to be that supportive mentor for companies making significant strides towards sustainability but still has some way to go.

By adopting this transition investing approach, BlackRock aims to play an active role in helping these companies shift to a low-carbon economy. This isn't just about offering financial incentives but about being hands-on—providing guidance, and resources, and holding companies accountable throughout their journey towards greener practices.

This strategic shift also underscores a broader realization in the financial sector: it’s no longer enough to sit on the sidelines and watch. Financial institutions need to roll up their sleeves and get involved. They have a crucial role to play in speeding up sustainability practices and ensuring companies are not just paying lip service to environmental concerns but are genuinely integrating these practices into their core operations.

BlackRock’s decision is a nod to this growing understanding. It reflects a proactive stance where the financial sector acknowledges its power and responsibility to drive significant changes in corporate behaviour. By backing companies in transition, BlackRock is betting on the future, as they are encouraging long-term, meaningful changes that align with the urgent need to address climate change and promote corporate responsibility.

In essence, BlackRock is setting a new standard. They are saying, "We’re not just here to reward the best in class; we’re here to help you become the best you can be." This approach could potentially reshape how the entire investment community views its role in sustainability, making it clear that the journey towards a sustainable future requires active participation and engagement from all sectors, especially finance.

As for Tariq Fancy’s opinion on this transition and the criticism that the company faced, he points out that the criticism of ESG "expedited a process that was probably going to happen anyway." He observes that ESG investing "lumped together a whole bunch of ideas" that weren't inherently similar. In his view, shifting just the environmental aspect into "transition" investing is "a natural way" for markets to "move forward."

He further explains that BlackRock "has all different kinds of investment groups" focused on creating "additionality" or "real-world impact." Fancy believes "the backlash" will enable BlackRock to hone and refine its sustainable investing strategies accordingly.

He also added, “I think the backlash just expedited a process that was probably going to happen anyway because the way to think about ESG is that it's an acronym that was created out of a report. In 2004 called "who wins-- who cares wins.”

Limitations of the broad ESG approach; Is Transition Investing the Answer?

When evaluating any investment strategy, it's crucial to weigh both its benefits and potential drawbacks. While ESG investing offers numerous appealing advantages, there are also several considerations that investors should keep in mind:

Limited Investment Options:

ESG investing restricts the pool of companies to those that meet certain environmental, social, and governance criteria. Consequently, this reduces the number of potential investment opportunities compared to the broader market of all publicly traded companies. This limitation might mean missing out on lucrative investments in companies that do not meet ESG standards.

Lack of Standardization:

A significant challenge with ESG investing is the absence of universally accepted standards for what constitutes an ESG-compliant company. This lack of standardization can create confusion and difficulty for investors trying to compare and evaluate different investment options. Without clear benchmarks, assessing the true ESG impact of various companies becomes complex and subjective.

Higher Investment Costs:

Incorporating ESG factors into the investment process often entails additional research and due diligence. Companies may need to invest in more comprehensive sustainability reports and third-party audits to validate their ESG claims. These added costs can lead to higher fees for investors, potentially reducing the overall returns on their investments.

Risk of “Greenwashing”:

Greenwashing is a deceptive practice where companies falsely claim to be environmentally friendly or socially responsible without substantive actions to back these claims. Investors may find it challenging to identify truly sustainable companies, as some businesses might present an inflated picture of their ESG practices. This misrepresentation can undermine the credibility of ESG investing and make it harder for investors to make informed decisions.

A relevant example of greenwashing can be found on the MoneySmart government website, which highlights instances where companies have been accused of overstating their environmental or social credentials.

Potential for Lower Returns:

There is a concern among some investors that focusing on companies with strong ESG practices could result in lower financial returns. The idea is that prioritizing ESG factors might exclude some high-performing companies that do not meet these criteria. However, it's worth noting that several studies suggest companies with robust ESG practices may achieve better long-term financial performance. The long-term benefits of sustainable business practices, such as reduced regulatory risks and enhanced brand reputation, could offset any short-term financial drawbacks.

Inexperience in ESG Investing:

For new investors, ESG investing can be a complex and unfamiliar territory. Assessing the ESG advantages and disadvantages of different investment options requires a certain level of expertise and understanding. Beginners might struggle with the nuances of evaluating ESG criteria, making it difficult to navigate the market effectively and select the best investments.

Potential Benefits of Transition Investing

Regulatory-backed transition planning is poised to significantly enhance investors' ability to allocate capital more effectively to enterprises with viable carbon reduction strategies. This approach not only streamlines the investment process but also boosts investor confidence by mitigating the risks of greenwashing. In this scenario, transition plans become invaluable, serving as critical tools for investors to assess the suitability of companies or projects for their portfolios. These plans are equally crucial for financial institutions, which both create and benefit from such structured transition strategies.

Research indicates that European retail investors face significant barriers in exercising their voting rights across borders within the EU. This limitation hampers their ability to engage consistently and robustly with the companies they invest in, missing out on the opportunity to influence corporate investment plans and business models towards more sustainable, lower-carbon pathways. This gap in engagement and voting rights is detrimental, as active share ownership is key to driving corporate focus on sustainable transitions.

For real economic changes through transition investing to take root, efficient engagement and a strong impact orientation are essential. However, more efforts are required to stimulate this development. Effective transition plans and regulatory support can empower investors and financial institutions alike, fostering a more sustainable and transparent investment landscape

The Future of Sustainable Investing

The future of sustainable investing needs the perfect balance between the goals and interests of an array of stakeholders. This balance is extremely important for the sustainability of investing as well as for serving society by enhancing long-term results. 

Navigating the future of sustainable investing balances several key aspects. At first, it is not that necessary to weigh financial and extra-financial considerations. This just means that it is essential to look beyond immediate profits to consider the broader impact of investments on society and the environment. Next, it also involves balancing the short-term and long-term goals making sure that immediate financial gains do not undermine future sustainability. Lastly, it is also about balancing the interests of various stakeholders to achieve fair outcomes for everyone involved. 

BlackRock's decision to transition its investment strategy towards more sustainable practices carries a multitude of potential benefits. Firstly, this move can serve as a powerful incentive for companies to reassess their operations and accelerate their transition towards more sustainable practices. As one of the world's largest asset managers, BlackRock wields significant influence, and its commitment to sustainable investing can encourage companies to align with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria more closely. This can lead to faster adoption of green technologies, reduced carbon footprints, and more responsible resource management across various industries.

Moreover, BlackRock's shift in focus can extend beyond addressing climate change to tackle other critical sustainability challenges such as biodiversity loss and social inequality. By incorporating these broader issues into its investment strategy, BlackRock can drive a more holistic approach to sustainability that encompasses the protection of ecosystems and the promotion of equitable social practices. This comprehensive approach ensures that the benefits of sustainable investing are far-reaching, impacting not only the environment but also societal well-being.

Encouraging More Companies to Shift 

BlackRock's shift in focus can extend beyond addressing climate change to tackle other critical sustainability challenges such as biodiversity loss and social inequality. By incorporating these broader issues into its investment strategy, BlackRock can drive a more holistic approach to sustainability that encompasses the protection of ecosystems and the promotion of equitable social practices. This comprehensive approach ensures that the benefits of sustainable investing are far-reaching, impacting not only the environment but also societal well-being.

Additionally, BlackRock's active engagement with companies undergoing transitions can play a crucial role in the standardisation of transition metrics. By setting clear expectations and providing guidance on best practices, BlackRock can help create a shared framework for assessing and reporting on transformation efforts. This can lead to greater transparency and comparability across industries, making it easier for investors, regulators, and other stakeholders to evaluate and support companies' sustainability initiatives. Standardised metrics also facilitate better tracking of progress and identification of areas needing improvement, thereby enhancing the overall effectiveness of sustainability efforts.

To sum up, BlackRock’s initiative to shift towards sustainable investment has caused an immense influence and has the potential to drive widespread adoption of sustainable practices among companies, address pressing environmental and social challenges, and establish robust frameworks for measuring and reporting on sustainability efforts. 

We can encourage and adopt the same strategy and collectively build a future where economic prosperity coexists with environmental sustainability as well as social well-being.

Although there are going to be some challenges and criticisms, BlackRock’s approach can influence and contribute towards more companies adopting sustainable investment. As many asset managers observe BlackRock’s steps, the financial industry may gradually adopt and refine sustainable investing, ultimately leading towards a more equitable society.

Our Directors’ Institute- World Council of Directors can help you accelerate your board journey by training you on your roles and responsibilities to be carried out efficiently, helping you make a significant contribution to the board and raise corporate governance standards within the organization.

57 views0 comments


  • alt.text.label.LinkedIn
  • alt.text.label.Facebook
bottom of page