Let me start with a question most boards have not yet asked themselves out loud. If an AI agent in your company places an order, signs off a refund, files a customs entry, or sends a quote to a client at 3 AM on a Sunday — and gets it wrong — who exactly is accountable on Monday morning? If you paused for a second there, you are not alone. That pause is the whole problem with agentic AI governance right now. Boards across India, the US, and Europe are sitting on a quiet shift

The Artificial Intelligence bill by the European Union has been passed and is a law now. Some provisions made by the act are in the process of being rolled out, some in the refinement phase through secondary guidance and parallel reforms, while some are already in practice. This brings about a governance moment that is familiar yet uncomfortable for boards of directors. Directors have to take matters like digital systems and artificial intelligence seriously at the oversight

The rise of generative AI has quietly changed the way modern boardrooms function. What once relied solely on human deliberation and handwritten notes is now being shaped by chat assistants, automated transcripts and intelligent summaries. A director can now review meeting minutes in seconds, a chair can generate sharper pre-board questions and the company secretary can capture discussions with near-perfect accuracy. But this convenience comes with a new kind of exposure — on

In a rapidly changing global business landscape, staying ahead of the curve means embracing cutting-edge technologies that drive...