Rethinking Governance: Why Cyber Expertise Must Be a Board Priority

Let’s be honest: a lot of boardrooms still don’t get cybersecurity. Directors talk endlessly about growth strategies, shareholder returns, and compliance. But if a cyberattack shuts the company down tomorrow, none of that strategy matters. We’ve seen it happen—ransomware freezing operations, supply chain hacks spreading like wildfire, stolen data tanking customer trust.

Cyber is not just an IT problem anymore. It’s a governance problem. And until boards accept that, they’re operating with a dangerous blind spot.

Cybersecurity Oversight Is More Than a Checkbox

Oversight is supposed to be the board’s bread and butter. Directors are there to guide management, mitigate risk, and protect long-term value. But cybersecurity oversight is still treated as an afterthought by too many companies.

Think about it. Boards sit through quarterly updates where the CISO presents a deck full of acronyms—MFA, SIEM, XDR—that most directors don’t even understand. Heads nod, budgets get approved, the meeting moves on. That isn’t oversight. That’s theater.

Real oversight means asking tough questions: What’s our recovery plan if we’re hit tomorrow? How long will it take us to detect a breach? Do we know which vendors in our supply chain are weakest? Those questions rarely get asked, because most boards don’t feel equipped to ask them. And that’s the gap we need to close.

The Boardroom Expertise Gap

Boards today are packed with former CEOs, CFOs, and lawyers. Those skills matter, but they reflect a 20th-century idea of governance. In the 21st century, the asset every company runs on is digital infrastructure. Data, cloud platforms, AI models, connected supply chains—this is where value lives, and also where risk lives.

Yet only a small fraction of large-company boards have a director with meaningful cybersecurity knowledge. One report estimated fewer than 15% of Fortune 500 boards include a cyber expert. Imagine running a pharmaceutical board without anyone who understands medicine, or a bank board without anyone who understands finance. That’s what’s happening right now in cyber.

The result is predictable: directors can’t challenge management, they can’t evaluate whether budgets are enough, and they can’t spot when oversight is purely symbolic.

Symbolic vs. Substantive Oversight

This is the heart of the problem. Symbolic oversight is when a board checks the box: “Yes, we reviewed cyber this quarter.” Substantive oversight is when cyber runs through the bloodstream of every big decision.

For example:

• Symbolic oversight says, “The IT team has cyber under control.”

• Substantive oversight says, “If we buy this company, what cyber risks come with the acquisition?”

• Symbolic oversight approves budgets without debate.

• Substantive oversight challenges whether money is being spent on prevention, detection, or resilience—and if that balance makes sense.

Symbolic oversight is governance theater. Substantive oversight is governance that actually protects the organization.

Regulators and Investors Are Turning Up the Heat

Boards might have gotten away with symbolic oversight five years ago. Not anymore.

The SEC in the U.S. now requires companies to disclose how boards oversee cybersecurity risk. That means you can’t just say “IT is handling it.” You have to explain what the board itself is doing. In Europe, regulations like NIS2 and DORA are putting directors directly on the hook for resilience failures. In the UK, the proposed Cyber Security and Resilience Bill will demand stronger governance structures.

And it’s not just regulators. Investors are paying attention, too. They know that one breach can slash valuation and sink trust. Increasingly, they view cyber resilience as a proxy for good governance. If your board can’t demonstrate it, that’s a red flag.

Why Cyber Expertise Makes Boards Better

Bringing cyber knowledge into the boardroom isn’t just about preventing attacks. It makes governance smarter across the board.

Boards with cyber-savvy directors make better calls on digital transformation. They greenlight AI projects with confidence because they understand the risks. They hold management accountable with real metrics, not fluffy jargon. They build reputations as companies that take trust seriously—which matters to customers, employees, and partners.

And let’s be clear: this isn’t about every director becoming a techie. It’s about baseline fluency. Just like every director is expected to understand financial statements, every director should understand enough about cyber to ask meaningful questions and spot weak answers.

How to Close the Gap

So what do boards actually need to do?

First, recruit at least one director with deep cybersecurity expertise. Not as a token, but as someone who can genuinely bridge the gap between technical teams and governance strategy.

Second, invest in training for the entire board. Cyber literacy can’t stop with one person. Directors should run tabletop exercises, hear regular threat briefings, and go through simulations. The goal isn’t to turn them into CISOs—it’s to make them fluent enough to govern.

Third, make cyber a standing agenda item. Don’t push it to the last 15 minutes of a quarterly meeting. Best practice is to review resilience regularly, every six to eight weeks, because the threat landscape evolves that quickly.

Finally, shift the mindset from prevention to resilience. Breaches will happen. The question is how quickly you detect, contain, and recover. That’s what separates companies that stumble from companies that survive.

Looking Ahead: The Cyber-Fluent Board

The future board is not just a group of financial and legal veterans. It’s a cyber-fluent governance team that sees digital resilience as the foundation of long-term value. These boards won’t treat cybersecurity as a compliance issue; they’ll treat it as strategy. They’ll weave it into decisions about mergers, expansion, innovation, and talent.

The alternative? Boards that keep pretending cyber is someone else’s problem—until an attack exposes the weakness. By then, it’s too late.

The next decade will separate the symbolic from the substantive. Only the latter will survive.

Conclusion

Cybersecurity is governance now. Boards that still treat it as an IT line item are governing blind. The expertise gap is too wide, and the risks are too high. Directors don’t all need to be cyber experts, but boards need real cyber literacy, real oversight, and real accountability.

Cyber expertise is not optional. It’s survival, it’s trust, and it’s the new baseline for modern governance.

References

• TechRadar (2024). Cyber moves from back office to boardroom—and investors are paying attention.

• McCormick Group (2024). How Much Cybersecurity Expertise Does a Board Need?

• Skadden (2024). The Informed Board: Emerging Expectations for Cybersecurity Oversight.

• Diligent (2024). Cybersecurity Governance: Why Boards Must Step Up.

• CSO Online (2023). 5 Ways Boards Can Improve Their Cybersecurity Governance.

Our Directors’ Institute - World Council of Directors can help you accelerate your board journey by training you on your roles and responsibilities to be carried out efficiently, helping you make a significant contribution to the board and raise corporate governance standards within the organization.